Showing posts with label support. Show all posts
Showing posts with label support. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Paper Markets


Brown-paper package or black box?

Unccovering the hidden costs of bail-out and stimulus packages.

THE recent announcement of the Federal Government's $42 billion stimulus package has prompted a lot of questions. Will it do the job? Does it have the right mix of measures? Is it big enough? Is it too big? Why have some groups missed out? And how will it be funded? Yet, the issue of the total cost of this and other support packages announced over the past four months has received scant media attention.

Many of the costs of government interventions go unstated, some by design, some not. When governments announce special packages, such as the $10.4 billion October Economic Security Strategy, the $4 billion November Australian Business Investment Partnership (to support major commercial property projects), the December $2 billion Car Dealer Financing package (to provide wholesale floor-plan financing to car dealerships), the February $42 billion Nation Building and Jobs Plan — to which I would add the $34 million child-care centre support package and the $6.2 billion New Car Plan — what they identify is the headline cost.

Six further categories of cost are associated with such packages:

■Delivery/implementation costs.
■Compliance costs.
■Costs of loans/loan guarantees.
■Opportunity costs.
■Government failure costs.
■The cost of moral hazard.

Delivery and compliance costs occur with all packages but will usually be minimal for broad-based tax and expenditure packages because the delivery mechanisms are already in place. But for
bail-outs, these costs involve the establishment of new program guidelines, the costs of assessing applicants, and then the costs of program monitoring. These can be resource intensive, especially where the form of help is loans or loan guarantees and the monitoring of companies in a fragile financial position is required.
Harder to identify because their link to subsequent expenditure is more tenuous are the costs associated with loans and loan guarantees. These may affect the credit rating of the government and impose higher future borrowing costs both on the government and on the private sector through crowding-out.
A major category of unstated
cost — and the cost that politicians like talking about least — are opportunity costs. Every dollar a government spends must be raised by taxes or borrowed from an owner who would have otherwise spent or saved it.

The main justification for doing this in regard to the stimulus packages is that the Government will spend more quickly than the owners of the funds would otherwise have done. In the case of bail-outs the justification must be to offset some form of failure in markets (for example, lack of availability of credit for "worthwhile" activities).
The extent of the positive impact the Government expects from the two stimulus packages seems to be limited to 75,000 jobs "protected" for the first package, and 90,000 "supported" for the second. Prospective benefits for the various bail-out packages have not been identified, with the exception of the $4 billion support package for commercial property projects, without which "up to 50,000 jobs out of 150,000 could be lost".
Unfortunately for governments, the projected economic impacts do not always come about. This may happen because the government's model is flawed or the assumptions behind the model are inappropriate. Or it may be because the government's perception of what is happening is mistaken — ranging from what exactly the problem is to how bad it is.


[SigmaForex Withdrawal Methods]

To withdraw funds from your account Please make sure that you have sufficient funds in place to cover the the necessary margin required for your open positions, after your requested withdrawal.

No requests for transfers to persons other than the account holder will be processed.
SigmaForex may require further identification or documentation in order to complete your request.
Please Note that transfer fees and bank charges may apply, and depend on the form of transfer.
Please note that we try to process the withdrawal request quickly. However, it may take up to 5 business days, depending on the method of transfer.

Your withdrawal from sigma account will be in an efficiently, secure and fast, you can withdraw money from your SigmaForex account at any time.

Withdrawal steps:

1. Login to your web account
2. Choose your withdrawal method
3. Fill the withdrawal form and write down the withdrawn amount

Friday, July 25, 2008

SigmaForex LTD Registrations And Regulations





SigmaForex LTD is leading European professional online trading Brokers registered in the United Kingdom and most of the EU countries.

What is meaning by registered?

means that there is a company called SigmaForex LTD inside united kingdom & registered by United Kingdom Law & follow the governmental rules.

SigmaForex LTD registered & follows the governmental rules in United Kingdom and anyone can check that by visiting this official website: http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/ this is a UK governmental website.

http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/d8846c7fe805874be7c646b1ed4f10ce/companysearch?disp=1&frfsh=1216759237#result this is the full link where you can find SigmaForex LTD with the registration number.

SigmaForex LTD Regulations:

SigmaForex LTD working now to be regulated with FSA (United Kingdom Financial Service Authority) but now SigmaForex LTD is complying with FSA and many financial authorities like NFA, CFTC, FSC and others.

Why SigmaForex LTD not working in the regulation of NFA?

Most of Traders ask this question and it's a common question for any broker. Here's the answer; NFA (National Future Association) regulate the Financial Companies that based in United State and have Future Trading. SigmaForex LTD not inside United State and doesn't has Future Trading. But NFA rules are compatible with the rules that SigmaForex is following and you can check with your self.

Complying: Means that this company follows the rules 100% and meet their regulatory obligations efficiently.

Dear Trader, you must be involved and know the difference between FSA and NFA. Many Forex Brokers inside united State not regulated by NFA because they don't work with Future Trading but they are complying with them & follow the same rules as the Forex broker that regulated with NFA.

Forex Broker Regulation - Part One

The Bank of EnglandWhat good is forex broker that you can trade and make money with, but when it comes time to take your money, they don't give it to you, because they don’t have it?

Forex Broker Bust Story. Refco was the biggest forex broker that was worth around $4 billion dollars. In October of 2005, Refco shut down its operations and every trader who had money with them got screwed big time.

Refco was regulated and for some time they were spending not only their profits but also deposits of their clients.
The amounts of money that traders saw on their trading platforms and the amounts of money Refco had in their bank accounts were different by $400 million.

So when the news hit the wire that Refco is running at such deficit, traders panicked and started asking for withdrawals. The only problem was that Refco was $400 million short of what it owed to traders.

There was a trial of course, and whatever assets the company had the court ordered to distribute among traders. I knew some people that had money with Refco. As far as I remember, after all assets were sold they got around 10% of what was owed to them. That means if person had $10,000 in his trading account, he got only $1,000 of it.

Forex Broker Regulation - Part Two

Difference Between Regulated And Complying

The Most Common Question that traders ask brokers is:
Seal of the United States Commodity Futures Tr...

"Are You Regulated by NFA?"
"Are You Regulated by FSA?"
"Are You Regulated by CFTC?"
"Are You Regulated by SEC?"
"Are You Regulated by SIPC?"
"Are You Regulated by FINRA?"
"Are You Regulated by Mr.X?" :)

No, Don't Ask this question because there are many fictions regulations. Don't Be The Fish!
The Right Action to take is to compare between the rules and restrictions of the regulatory associations and the rules that the broker follow.

Complying With FSA means that this broker working in the regulation process and follow all the rules that the regulatory body has.

Regulated By FSA means that this broker already regulated by FSA & may Follow the rules.

Why?
NFA, FSA, CFTC, SIPC, SEC, .....etc all of these associations are private sectors in the origin. The Main Aim is to Collect as much brokers as they can to increase from their popularity beside the governmental associations
Do You Know that FSA, NFA or others charge Millions Of Dollars to authorize the regulation of brokers. All these money are distributed as following;
1- Part For The Tax Authority
2- Part For The Private Sector
3- Part For Governmental Sector
Some Brokers Play with these rules after paying all of these parts and it's time for scamming.

Don't Take Your Decision After The 1st Impression
Test The Services
Test The Trust
Test The Security
Test The Attitude
Test The Credibility
Test The History
Test The Quality
Test The Speed
Compare With Others
The Take Your Decision!

Forex Broker Regulation - Part Three

FSA's headquarters, 25 The North Collonade, Ca...

The difference Between NFA (National Future Association) And FSA (Financial Services Authority)

NFA [National Future Association]:
To Be Able To Register in NFA you must have the following:
  1. You Brokerage Firm Based in United State
  2. Working in Futures
These two rules are basically must be there to be able to regulate with NFA

FSA [Financial Services Authority]:
To be able to register with The FSA your brokerage firm must be exist & based in United Kingdom

Question: I have a brokerage Firm in United Kingdom. Can I register with NFA?
Answer: No You Can't. But If you have branches in USA you can do it

Question:
I have a brokerage Firm in USA. Can I register with FSA?
Answer: No You Can't